You say family matters most. But you're spending your best hours somewhere else, or you're holding a boundary that feels like betrayal, or you're doing things for them that contradict what you actually believe. The question isn't whether family is important—it's whether it's one of your actual core values, or whether you're performing a value you inherited.
Who This Is For (and Who It Is Not)
This is for you if you're caught between what you think you should value and what you notice you actually prioritize when the pressure is on. You might say family is your highest value, but when you track where your time and money actually go, something doesn't add up. Or you're making a decision that affects your family relationships and you need to know whether you're honoring your own values or abandoning them. You're not looking for permission—you're looking for clarity.
This is also for you if you feel the pull to put family first and you resent it, or you feel relieved when you don't, and that relief confuses you. You might be questioning whether the family-focused narrative you grew up with actually belongs to you. You're not asking the question to get an answer you already have. You're asking because the answer might change something.
This is not for you if you're looking for a way to justify neglecting your family relationships. It's also not for you if you've already clearly decided that family is not a core value for you and you're looking for validation—you've already got your answer. This is a process of honest discernment, not a tool for confirming what you've already decided.
What You Will Discover
Once you map your actual values using Schwartz's framework, you'll see something most people miss: family shows up differently depending on which aspect you're looking at. Benevolence—caring for close relationships—is nearly universal. But family obligation, family hierarchy, family conformity, and family loyalty are not the same value. You might score high on benevolence but low on conformity, which means you care deeply about the people close to you and you won't follow their rules blindly. That's not a contradiction. That's information. You'll understand which family dynamics align with your actual values and which ones are carrying weight they don't belong carrying.
You'll also see where you're in tension. Schwartz's research shows that some values sit opposite each other on the values circumplex. If you genuinely value both self-direction and family obligation equally, you're not confused—you're experiencing a real structural conflict that millions of people navigate. Once you see that conflict clearly, instead of feeling it as personal failure, you can make choices instead of just reacting. The relief is not in the answer. It's in finally naming what you're actually weighing.
Common Reasons People Wait
The first reason is that you're afraid the answer will require you to change something. If family isn't actually one of your core values, then the guilt you've been carrying might lift—and the responsibility shifts. You'd have to stop accepting invitations out of obligation. You'd have to set boundaries you've been avoiding. Part of you wants the assessment to confirm that family is your highest value, because then the guilt makes sense and you know what you're supposed to do. The reframe: clarity about what you actually value doesn't require you to cut anyone off. It requires you to stop pretending. The people who matter will know the difference.
The second reason is that you're not sure how an assessment could possibly capture something as complex as your relationship to family. Family isn't a single value—it's tangled up with loyalty, security, tradition, belonging, control, and sacrifice all at once. A framework seems too simple. That's true. But Schwartz's circumplex model accounts for that. It shows you that those different aspects of family sit in different places on the values map, and they can pull in different directions. The framework doesn't oversimplify family. It makes the complexity visible instead of just overwhelming.
The third reason is that you think you already know the answer. You know family matters to you, so what's the point. The point is that knowing family matters is not the same as knowing which aspects of family matter to you, and which ones don't. You might discover that you value belonging and closeness but not obligation and hierarchy. Or you might value your chosen family more than your biological family, and you've been organizing your life around the wrong relationships. The assessment isn't meant to tell you something obvious. It's meant to tell you something true that you've been too busy to notice.
The My Values assessment surfaces your values, ranks them, and shows you where you are and are not living them. That's where the work becomes specific.
Is family usually one of people's top core values?
Not necessarily in the way people expect. Schwartz's research across 80+ countries shows that benevolence—care for close others—ranks high for most people. But "family as a value" often means something narrower: obligation, hierarchy, and conformity to family norms. Those rank much lower for many people, especially younger adults and people in individualistic cultures. People often conflate "family matters to me" with "family obligation is my core value," and those aren't the same thing.
What if I realize family isn't one of my core values? Does that make me a bad person?
No. It makes you honest. Some people genuinely value achievement, autonomy, or community contribution more than family ties. Schwartz's research shows that value hierarchies vary widely, and they're not moral rankings—they're descriptions of what actually drives your choices. You can love your family and not have family obligation as a core value. The guilt comes from thinking they should be the same thing.
Can your core values change, especially around family?
Values are relatively stable across adulthood, but life circumstances can shift your priorities temporarily. Having children often brings family higher in the hierarchy. Leaving a controlling family system often reshuffles it entirely. The assessment shows you where you are now. If your circumstances change significantly, your hierarchy might too, and it's worth reassessing.
What's the difference between benevolence and family values in Schwartz's framework?
Benevolence is about caring for the welfare of close others—whoever they are. Family is about obligation, conformity, and loyalty to family systems and traditions specifically. You can score high on benevolence and low on family conformity, meaning you care deeply about people in your life while resisting family pressure to act against your own judgment. These are distinct values, and many people hold both, or one more strongly than the other.